The expression “it is better to light a candle than to curse the darkness” is often said to be an ancient Chinese proverb. Many even attribute it to China’s greatest philosopher, the legendary sixth century BC sage and government advisor/official Kong Fuzi himself. There is not much in the way of evidence to support these claims. The earliest known use of the saying goes back only to the early twentieth century AD, during which century it spread like wildfire due to its popularity among liberal Democrat American presidents and their wives. Although Roosevelt and Kennedy predated the period in which liberal Democrats became enamoured of all things Chinese provided they were no older than the Cultural Revolution it is probably stretching credibility to the breaking point to suggest that they had some special insight into the Confucian origins of an adage that continues to elude the best scholars in the field.
In actuality, it is difficult to imagine such a saying
originating in the wisdom literature of any ancient civilization when it so
clearly bears the manufacturing stamp of twentieth century, Western, liberalism
on it. As a comparative value judgement
it is a truism and an insipid, banal, and trite one at that. It implies that we are under some sort of
moral requirement to make an either/or choice between lighting a candle and
cursing the darkness, thus demanding the question why one cannot do both, to
which question, of course, there is no answer.
Today is a good day to be contemplating these matters.
It is the second day of the second month. On the liturgical calendar it is a Feast
Day, the official designation of which in the Book of Common Prayer is “The Presentation of Christ in the Temple
Commonly Called the Purification of Saint Mary the Virgin”. This is because it is forty days after
Christmas. The Mosaic Law required in
the twelfth chapter of the book of Leviticus that after a woman gave birth to a
male child she would undergo a forty day purification period after which she
would present the child in the tabernacle – later the Temple – to which she
would bring a lamb for a burnt offering and a pigeon or turtledove for a sin offering,
or, if this was beyond her means, two turtledoves or pigeons for both
offerings. The fulfilment of these
requirements is recorded in the second chapter of the Gospel According to St.
Luke – it is specified that the second option for the offering was taken – which
is the occasion upon which Simeon and Anna prophesy over the Holy Infant. The informal designation of this Feast is
Candlemas. (1) This title alludes to the ancient custom of
the blessing of the candles which traditionally occurs on this day. The candles, representing Christ as the
Light of the World, are presented in Church in ceremonial reenactment of the
presenting of Christ in the Temple, and are blessed.
In how many parishes will this be occurring this year?
Not very many.
The Hungarian Jewish writer Arthur Koestler is most
remembered for his 1940 novel Darkness at
Noon. In the novel, his protagonist,
Nikolai Salmanovich Rubashov, is taken away by the secret police of the
revolutionary regime he helped create in the middle of the night, and
imprisoned. He is given a number of
hearings, not for the purpose of determining guilt or innocence but obtaining
his confession. Ultimately, he gives the
confession and is executed. Although
the story and its characters are fictional they represent real events that had
just taken place in the Soviet Union. After
Joseph Stalin had become dictator he had secured his control over the Communist
Party and his absolute rule over the Soviet Union by ruthlessly eliminating his
rivals within the party. One of the
more conspicuous elements of the Purge were the show trials, held in Moscow
from 1936 to 1938, in which Trotskyists and other Old Bolsheviks who dissented
to Stalin’s rule were made to publicly confess to various crimes before they
were put to death.
It was Koestler’s girlfriend at the time, Daphne Hardy who
later went on to become a sculptor, who gave the book its title. She was also the one who translated it from
his German manuscript and arranged for its publication in London, while
Koestler was fleeing the Nazis in a highly adventurous manner. The title was inspired by the fourteenth
verse of the fifth chapter of Job although it has little to do with what
Eliphaz the Temanite was haranguing Job about.
It refers to the contrast between the reality (darkness) and the
illusion (noon) of Communism as experienced by true believers – such as
Rubashov within the novel, and Koestler its author (2) – who are brought to the
realization that the ideal paradise they believed they were creating was
actually an extremely oppressive tyranny.
It seems that no matter how many times the darkness of
Communism is revealed for what it is – when a Malcolm Muggeridge tells the
world about the Terror Famine in the Ukraine, when an Arthur Koestler paints a
literary picture of the Show Trials, when an Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn brings the
GULAG to light – there will be those who blindly look to Communism as a source
of light.
Today, our governments have taken away our most basic rights
and liberties. They have forbidden us
from gathering together socially, assembling as religious communities to
worship, and in some jurisdictions, even to leave our homes without their
explicit permission and a justification they consider valid. They have forbidden large portions of the
population from running their own businesses or earning their own livings for
extended periods of time, and basically told us all that we must look to
government rather than to our businesses and jobs for our means of
support. They have conditioned us to
expect security guards to be the first and last people we see everywhere we go,
to be under constant surveillance, and to be stopped by enforcement agents at
any time and made to give an account of why we are out and what we are
doing. They have encouraged us to
snitch on our friends and neighbours every time we see or suspect them of
violating any of an ever growing list of infractions. Protests against these lockdowns are broken
up by police and the protestors fined and/or arrested. We are told by the media, speaking with a
monolithic voice much like the press in the Soviet Union, that all of this is
humanitarian and necessary for the greater good. Everything about this, right down to the “science”
invoked as justification for it all, resembles nothing so much as the dark
tyranny the Bolsheviks imposed upon Russia a century ago.
These lockdowns are the reason that Churches will not be
meeting to bless the candles today. The
politicians and health bureaucrats have declared that Church services are “non-essential”
and, even though it is clearly Satan’s opinion that the politicians and health
bureaucrats are speaking, the Church leaders have decided to obey man rather
than God.
Which brings us back to where we started. The nonsense that it is “better to light a
candle than to curse the darkness”.
Unless the Churches start cursing the darkness that is
Communism – including the Communism that wears the mask of public health orders
to slow the spread of bat flu – instead of kissing its butt they will never be
able to light candles again.
(2) Nine years after Darkness at Noon came out, Richard Crossman’s anthology of ex-communists-turned-anti-communists The God That Failed was published. Koestler was one of the contributors.
1836-1938....thats a looong trial!
ReplyDeleteIndeed. Trials take time when you are not constrained by constitutional requirements for judicial expediency. Especially when you have to wait 42 years for the person against whom the alleged treason is said to have been committed to be born.
Delete