Rod Dreher is a writer who blogs at the website of The American Conservative, the magazine founded by Pat Buchanan, Taki Theodoracopulos and Scott McConnell in 2002 to oppose the foreign policy of the George W. Bush administration and more specifically the drive for war in Iraq from the right. Dreher is also the author of such books as Crunchy Cons (2006), How Dante Can Save Your Life (2015), The Benedict Option (2017), and most recently, Live Not By Lies which was released earlier this year. The last title mentioned warns small-o orthodox Christians – Dreher, who was raised Protestant, became a Roman Catholic and is now Eastern Orthodox with a large-O – about the coming “soft totalitarianism” to which wokeness, the more militant successor to political correctness, is leading the Western world. Note that there are many who would generally agree with Dreher’s assessment of wokeness but suggest that a past tense would be more appropriate than a future one.
Earlier this year, Dreher posted a piece entitled “Your
Woke Breaking Point” at his blog. He began with an excerpt from an article by
Megan McArdle at the Washington Post
about how Donald Trump’s predictions of four years ago as to how the attacks on
Confederate monuments would lead to attacks on monuments to the American
republic’s founders, such as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson, were
coming true. McArdle, in her editorial,
referenced Dreher’s “Law of Merited Impossibility” which has been stated
several different ways, the best known being “It will never happen, and when it
does you bigots will deserve it”. The
law satirizes, without exaggerating in the least, the paradox of the typical
progressive response to conservative warnings about the direction in which
left-wing causes seem to be heading, before and after the predictions are
fulfilled. It is likely to end up being
Dreher’s single most significant and lasting contribution to political discourse. McArdle’s
article referencing it was an uncharacteristic moment of liberal
self-criticism, in which she discussed the progressive side’s seeming inability
to restrain its radicals and apply the brakes when they are going too far and
too fast.
Dreher used the excerpt from McArdle’s article to introduce
a challenge that he borrowed from mathematician James A. Lindsay. Lindsay had tweeted
on the 24th of June:
Talking with a brilliant friend last night keyed me
into an important idea: everybody has a Woke breaking point, a point where they
can’t deny any longer the fact that it’s a totalitarian nightmare. Encourage
your sympathetic friends to start naming what theirs would be.
Dreher re-posted Lindsay’s
tweet and several follow-up tweets, the first of which went:
Whose statue has to come down? Seriously, whose is the
last straw? Who has to get cancelled? Fired? Doxxed? Destroyed? Beaten up?
Killed? Does it take a lynching? Does it
take destroying the thing YOU love? Your family? Your kids? Your job? Your
hobby? What is it? What’s too far?
It is an excellent question and one that we would do well to
pose to any liberals of our acquaintance.
What do the Social Justice Warriors – the BLM, Antifa and MeToo# types --
have to do before you will admit that they have gone too far?
There is a very similar question that I would suggest we
start posing to people. Or perhaps it
is the same question asked in a different context.
This question I would pose to all those people who think
that all the public health orders, all the restrictions imposed to control the
spread of the Wuhan bat flu, are necessary and especially to those who think
that even more restrictions are called for.
I will note, obiter dictum, that Rod Dreher himself was certainly one of
these back in the spring. Whether he
still is or not I am unaware because he has written far less on that subject in
recent months than in March, April and May.
The question is simply this – what is your Bat Flu Breaking
Point?
Let us clarify the matter with some follow up questions.
What do our public health officials have to do for you to
agree that they have gone too far? What
line do they have to cross? What
freedom do they have to take away? How
much imposed loneliness, isolation, and misery is too much? How many small businesses have to be
destroyed? How many people have to lose
their jobs? How many people have to be
driven to suicide, drunkenness and substance abuse? At what point is keeping us safe no longer
worth the price we are being forced to pay for it?
Would curtailing to the point of eliminating our basic
freedoms of association, assembly and religion be going too far?
Would telling people that they have to close the small businesses
that has been in their families and served their local communities for
generations and which they have been struggling to keep afloat for years right
in the busiest shopping time of the year, the period that they rely upon to
make enough to balance their books, be crossing the line?
Would fining people thousands of dollars for acts that are
not only not mala in se but are
rather clearly bona in se although
forbidden by some petty health order be one step too many in the direction of
totalitarianism?
Would opening a snitch line and encouraging people to rat
out their family, friends and neighbours be the straw that breaks the camel’s
back?
Would establishing a special police force – a Gestapo,
Cheka/NKVD, or Stasi so to speak – for enforcing public health orders be the
limit of what is tolerable?
Everything I have mentioned so far has already been done here
in Manitoba and, indeed, in most if not all of the other provinces of the
Dominion of Canada. For the many who
support all of these measures and say they are “necessary” it is difficult to
imagine what further step could possibly be taken that would finally have these
people saying that it is too much.
Would it take forcing everybody to have foreign substances,
including modified RNA, injected into their bodies upon penalty of not being
allowed to work, buy groceries, or go anywhere if they refuse?
Would even telling everyone that they must pledge their
allegiance to Satan by having 666 tattooed on their right hand or forehead in
order to stop the spread of COVID-19 finally be enough to do it?
Ask everyone you know who is in favour of the sanitary
dictatorship what their Bat Flu Breaking Point is.
@Gerry - Very good post.
ReplyDeleteOf course, those who have tried this sort of thing will know that this kind of decisive, irrefutable, knock-down-drag-out argument makes zero difference in real life; and will instead bring down wrath upon anyone who uses it (if, which is very unlikely, they are allowed to complete the argument without being interrupted, silenced, or left alone speaking to a void).
I spent 20+ years of my life doing that kind of thing, so the experience of wasting my time/ having a counterproductive effect is familiar and somewhat bitter!
Anyway; the main thing is that you make the point so clearly that from it we can move on to a further and deeper understanding; resulting from the recognition that this Breaking Point has been reached and passed multiple times for almost everyone in The West (and maybe, since the birdemic coup is global, almost everyone throughout the world).
So, we live in a world where there is No 'breaking point' (or where the breaking point is open-endedly shift-able in a leftward direction); where there is nothing that the masses will-Not-accept in the name of... well, a wide and expanding range of excuses includng the birdemic, antiracism, climate change and the latest evolution of the sexual revolution...
This is precisely what wise Men said (more than a century ago) would happen if God was regarded as dead, and was forgotten.
My conclusion is exactly at WmJas Tychonievich said yesterday*:
This Is The End.
And spiritually to prepare accordingly - as best I can.
* https://narrowdesert.blogspot.com/2020/11/et-in-arcadia.html
Thank you, Bruce.
DeleteIn posing the challenge here I am not so deluded as to think that it will open enough eyes as to change the course of events. The good of those few individuals who have not completely sealed themselves off in this "Great Delusion" is all I am aiming at.
Your conclusion is certainly difficult to argue against. It raises the question of whether this is The End which every civilization eventually arrives at or The End in the ultimate and final sense. Either way, it confirms the last line in T. S. Eliot's "The Hollow Men" about the world ending with a whimper rather than a bang - and a pretty pathetic whimper at that.
Have you noticed the ironic paradox that if this is indeed The End, then the climate doom alarmists and those who have been treating this virus as if we were living out Stephen King's "The Stand" are, in a sense completely the opposite of what they mean by it, right about this being the Apocalypse?
"I am the way, the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me."
ReplyDeleteChristendom was the acknowledgement that Christ's authority extended over a territory. Beginning with the French Revolution and accelerating during the First World War, that territory, hard fought for over fifteen hundred or more years, began to recede. In the wake of the retreat, demons once swept clean returned seven fold and entropy took hold.
Life has been grossly devalued (death cult practices of abortion and euthanasia are celebrated, sterile and narcissistic sexuality promoted), truth has been relativised (spin, ie. centrifugal forces acting on the perception of reality tears apart understanding and knowledge) and everyone has lost the way (self indulgence is the only valid expression and so morality is tossed aside in favour of ubiquitous and elastic "tolerance" - to be intolerant or bigoted is the only sin).
If there is no path, no truth, and no life, the breaking point is never reached since there is no longer anything of substance to break. All is descending into the void and chaos out of which it was created ex nihilo.
Agree with Mr. Charleton, a very good post. The discussion will not change anyone's mind but will help those of us willing to engage in it to find deeper appreciation and understanding of what's happening around us. As mentioned a few times here, this is a spiritual battle. The only way to fight it is to be fortified by the way, the truth, and the life.
Thank you Mr. Henderson. I like your application of Matthew 12:43-45 to the recession of Christendom.
Delete